GcMAF & Big Pharma
The UK's equivalent of the FDA, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), have been stunting the advancement of privately funded medicine in favour of the worlds largest pharmaceutical companies. If you value the health of your family and future generations, sign and share this petition NOW
The MHRA has been proven to be a tool of “Big Pharma”, a puppet of the worlds largest pharmaceutical industries. Far from the task of protecting the public from harmful health care the MHRA is in fact protecting the largest pharmaceutical companies from loss of profits instead. There are many less expensive and effective alternatives for doctors to choose from for maintaining or returning to good health. The MHRA actively prevents access to these, our own choice of medications in favour of harmful often unproven drugs of the profiteering big pharmaceutical companies.
We have heard that months ago on the 28th January 2015 the MHRA ruthlessly terminated the production of GcMAF in England.
GcMAF is a human protein all of us naturally produce, and a human right; it has no side effects. It is the best treatment known for 90% of cancers, and 50 other diseases. People with run down immune systems can’t make it, and need external GcMAF to cure their diseases. It was discovered in 1990, and the MHRA has deliberately concealed this powerful but harmless product from the public since then.
200 scientists have since written over 100 scientific research papers on GcMAF, and Immuno Biotech Ltd have supplied 10,000 people, and achieving fabulous results before the MHRA closed this laboratory down.
As the regulatory agency they should have helped Immuno Biotech Ltd (IBL) to get the product into the NHS as soon as possible. Conversely they abused their position, to protect the profits of the big pharmaceutical companies that they illegally represent.
Rather than taking mature intelligent approach by making a telephone call to arrange a meeting, instead the MHRA raided IBL’s Cambridge laboratory with 8 police officers in attendance, 4 in bullet proof vests, interrogated and terrorised the two female scientists who were on duty for eight hours. They ladies were so badly traumatised by this experience they could not work for months afterwards.
The MHRA closed Immuno Biotech’s bank accounts using the illegal compliance system, and the company was forced to cease trading.
The MHRA somehow closed the CEO’s personal bank accounts and left him penniless. They are now doing the same to other members of his family.
On the MHRA’s website they published 18 fraudulent misrepresentations about IBL’s excellent sterility record.
The MHRA committed perjury and fraudulent misrepresentation in their witness statement to Canterbury Crown court to obtain a restraint order.
By denying the public this one excellent treatment, GcMAF, that saves lives, the MHRA are in fact committing a crime against humanity. 160,000 people a year die unnecessarily in Britain from cancer; most could and should have been saved.
The MHRA, the UK Drug Safety Agency, Falsified Vaccine Safety Data – Millions of Children At Serious Risk
GSK’s Cervarix HPV vaccines for cervical cancer: The MHRA systematically tampered with 6000 reports of adverse reactions to declare the vaccine safe............The MHRA’s Director Gerald Heddell and CEO Ian Hudson are both ex GSK, Glaxo Smith Kline.
House of Commons Health Select Committee Report of 2005
"In view of the failings of the MHRA, we recommend a fundamental review."
MHRA: Regulators' trail of deception has been exposed
Andrew Miller, the chairman of a parliamentary select committee, has said that a “trail of deception” has been exposed in the system.
MHRA under fire amid calls for shake-up of regulatory system
The scandal of device regulation in the UK
Horton said: “The MHRA’s mission is ‘to enhance and safeguard the health of the public by ensuring that medicines and medical devices work and are acceptably safe’. The MHRA is, by its own admission, unable to fulfill this mission.
MHRA, The Seroxat killer:
Parmjit Dhanda, MP, Gloucester is asking the Government why they allowed Dr Ian Hudson, the MHRA CEO, to take part in the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA)’s review of Seroxat, an antidepressant. As well as working as worldwide safety director for GSK – the manufacturers of Seroxat (Paxil, Paroxetine)– from 1999 until 2001, Dr Hudson acted as witness for the defence in a trial in which Seroxat was accused of triggering a man’s violent and suicidal behavior.
Paul Flynn MP, Newport: What credibility does the MHRA have?
Recent events have proven that it is not a watchdog; it is a pussycat that purrs in front of the pharmaceutical industry and does what it is told. It has an incestuous relationship with the big pharmas and has a close association with the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. It has a disgraceful recent record. We can look with gratitude to the work not of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency in protecting the public, but to people such as Sarah Boseley of The Guardian for her exposé of the organisation, to the television programme "Panorama" and to Richard Brook of Mind, who courageously resigned from the MHRA in disgust at its activities.
It is a matter of enormous importance that, in recent history, the regulator is not protecting the 25,000 people who suffered heart attacks and the 7,000 who died from taking a painkilling drug for arthritics that was withdrawn by Merck Sharpe and Dohme in September, after being promoted by the regulator.
MHRA conceals Seroxat causes suicide
"The MHRA had information in its possession for more than a decade that high doses of the anti-depressant Seroxat can lead to aggression and thoughts of suicide. But instead of revealing the truth to the 17,000 people taking high doses and the other half-million Britons on a safer dose, the MHRA sat on its findings. Astonishingly, I was actually threatened with legal action by Professor Kent Woods, chief executive of the MHRA, if I revealed this."---RICHARD BROOK
The MHRA is GlaxoSmithKline, Aventis Pasteur, Merck, Sharpe and Dohme
A Sunday Express investigation found that nearly a third of the 181 experts who sit on the Medicines Control Agency (MCA, now the MHRA) committees are linked to Glaxo Smith Kline, Aventis Pasteur or Merck, Sharpe and Dohme......The MCA has continued to endorse the triple measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) jab despite concerns linking it to autism and stomach disorders. But the extent of the MCA members’ financial ties to MMR manufacturers raises questions about potential conflicts of interest."--Sunday Express
Licensed drugs are the number 4 killer of mankind
The MHRA’s big brother, the USA’s FDA, admits drugs, ie those the FDA and MHRA license, kill scores of thousands. That’s what happens when the regulator is controlled by the drug companies. The MHRA conceal this.
The MHRA is criticised for failing to adequately regulate implants
with grim consequences for some patients. While the board contains retired senior executives from AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme, it includes no one from a patient group, or any other body representing people whose health could be damaged by its decisions.
The web of unelected bodies functions as a kind of shadow government, drafting and enforcing policies, disbursing money, regulating – or failing to regulate – business, quietly, unobtrusively, without effective public scrutiny or restraint. When it is unbalanced, crawling with conflicts of interest, it makes a nonsense of democracy.
The MHRA protects the monopolies of the billion dollar pharmaceuticals (who charge, e.g. £40,000 for a round of chemotherapy), and ruthlessly closes down inexpensive, effective treatments wherever it can.
Even the courts know the MHRA is corrupt
The MHRA has never successfully prosecuted a company since it was established nearly 10 years ago. (It seems judges won't accept evidence from so corrupt a source.)